What is SPIN (Scythe Project in Nepal)?
What is SPIN? On a shoestring budget, two volunteers brought dozens of scythes to the mountains of Nepal, where, like in much of Asia, the harvesting of grains and fodder is traditionally done with sickles. In recent years, many young people from the countryside have been leaving their family farms in the hope of escaping this drudgery, and finding a brighter future in the city. Every day, over 1,300 Nepalese, mostly men, are leaving the country for employment in neighbouring countries. As a result, fewer people are working Nepal's land, which undermines the self-sufficiency and food security of the region. A means of speeding up the harvest would be of clear benefit to Nepali farmers. Introducing the scythe to places where the sickle is traditionally used will result in several benefits. Scythes ease the burden of harvesting with a sickle, which involves bending or squatting for hours. At the same time, a scythe increases productivity without introducing petroleum-powered machinery. During the initial scythe demonstrations in Nepal, local farmers and agriculture officers were impressed by what they thought was a new invention, as they had never seen it before. They couldn't believe it when they were told that the scythe has been around for centuries. Most of the development agencies are promoting motorized alternatives, to replace sickles. However, the scythe's simplicity and manual operation makes it the truly appropriate technology upgrade from sickles in rural Nepal and other less developed countries. The introduction of petroleum-powered machines increases dependency on imported fossil fuels and spare parts. Initial training in use and maintenance of the scythe is required, as the level of skill will directly affect the result. Maintenance is part of the basic skill set, and is performed by the user. If major repairs are necessary, they can be done by a local blacksmith. While the scythe is an excellent example of appropriate technology, to implement it remains a challenge. It takes an innovative, resourceful, and committed effort to adapt the tool to local needs and at the same time make the best of local resources. Scythe Works is actively seeking an organization with established contacts in Nepal that would recognize the potential of the scythe project and would help us continue this work. A few key differences between scythes and the motorized harvesters sometimes called "Chinese rice and wheat reapers": reaper: - fossil fuel dependent, fuel must be imported - higher cost, shorter life - weight 8 - 15 kg - noisy, with exhaust fumes - all equipment and spare parts must be imported scythe: - fossil fuel independent - low cost, long life - weight 2 - 3 kg - no noise, no exhaust - all needed equipment can be fabricated locally For more information please go to http://www.scytheworks.com/SPIN.html Thank you for your support, Alexander Vido
Comments
-
great idea share for people
-
I am.interested this product kitni cost hai iski
-
its very odd that the scythe has not spread to there by now
-
I'd like to see a competition between someone using a sirupati kukri and another using a scythe in harvesting a hectare of rice or wheat or corn or sugar cane or watermelons. Which instrument will come out on top? Is it the scythe or is it the kukri?
I'd like to see the instruments used on combat too. Which would win a person using a scythe or a person using the kukri? :D -
Isn't Nepal where the Gurkhas come from? And don't the Gurkhas use the kukris? And don't they also use the sirupati kukris for cutting vegetation, grasses, and for harvesting? I'd think that the sirupati kukri would be better than awkard scythe for harvesting. The kukris come in all shapes and sizes.
-
glad the indian people and nepali get the wisdom to do not use gas and technology that means increase the price of the product and poison our world. my best wishes for you... from costa rica, go ahead.
-
This is a great idea!!! Introducing traditional, but still improved equipment to such regions instead of dumping state-of-the art machinery there which cannot be maintained, binds enormous investment (for local standards anyway) and creates dependency from imported spare parts and fuel.
What comes into my mind is the question if there is more such technology that can be adapted and if there are other regions, e.g. africa, where the concept could be applied.
Other technology could include flails (much advanced compared to simple sticks) or modern ploughs which turn the soil instead the hook ploughs which only scrape it. -
Its a very useful equipment. Can you please help me from where to buy the same. Kindly email the details at kmrmohit@gmail.com I need this equipment for India in Jharkhand
-
Those noobs use their arms.... clearly the tool is meant to be used by spinning the body while keeping the handle close to the bodies centre instead.
-
try getting in contact with kukhri house .... they are a kuhri ( fighting/ combat/ harvesting blade) company that could provide tools or at least the blades for the Nepalese people.... check out their website... just google gurka house kuhris
-
The asian squat is not tiring, it's actually a complete resting position.
That is the reason why sickles are the best way to harvest. -
What a great project! I came across it when looking for an example of using a scythe to go with one of my favorite songs, something I plan to teach soon to some children. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl7YleQeDMg
-
have you tried doing a kickstarter or indiegogo campaign? this is exactly the sort of thing croudfunding was meant for.
-
Motorized scythes, as we call them here in Germany (Motorsense) do not even deserve the name but are much harder to handle and much less efficient than a real scythe (at least for me). That invention leads into a deadlock for several reasons, the dependance as mentioned in the video and their inefficiency. I was always wondering why people use such stupid machinery.
-
What happened in the rest of the world when the scythe was introduced ?
-
great project
-
Does that 'catcher' on the scythe have a name??
-
Someone asked about the difference in output/yield between the motorized harvester and the scythe mentioned at the end of the video. I would say the outputs are fairly comparable.
An estimated cutting speed for a scythe: up to 1/4 acre per hour.
The cutting speed with the scythe depends on several variables like the user's skill, length of the scythe blade, efficiency of the grain cradle, and sharpness of the blade. However, at the harvest time it is not only about the speed; the desired result matters as well.
On a promotional website the listed cutting speed for a motorized harvester: 1 acre per hour (which seems much too high, especially when cutting wheat for bundling into sheaves).
Simon Fairlie of the UK watches scythe versus brushcutter competitions every year and the races are pretty close. Simon says: If the guy in the promotional video is doing one swing every 2.5 seconds, and his cutting blade is one foot in diameter, then he would have to be cutting a swath 30 foot wide to achieve 1 acre per hour (instead of the 6 foot wide swath he is cutting)…
more: http://www.scytheworks.com/s-sc-wr.html
4m 32sLenght
187Rating