How Planting Rainforest Trees Can Stop Global Warming

1. What an amazing person she is. Metta.
2. Shared
3. Global warming. Heh. What a scam. The earths climate has been changing since the planet was formed and people are gullible enough to believe that we are now the cause. The agenda behind climate change legislation is global wealth redistribution. Period.
4. passion! Great job guys!
5. Hope your friends are ok in Costa Rica.....lots of storms & flooding this week.....
6. The physics upon which the carbon dioxide scam is based violates the Stefan Boltzmann Law, Wien's Displacement Law and the Second Law of Thermodynamics which causes there to be a stable equilibrium temperature gradient as the state of maximum entropy. The physical evidence that water vapor cools also proves it all wrong. If water vapor warmed (as the IPCC claims) then the whole world would be at 100% humidity due to a runaway effect.
   
   Thankfully Donald Trump will eventually put an end to the sheer waste of trillions of dollars that could be better spent saving lives in many ways. The scammers are very worried because the fact that Trump was voted in shows that public opinion is changing and fewer are still gullible enough to be fooled by blankets in the sky supposedly formed by 0.04% of the atmosphere that is carbon dioxide. Greenhouse gases are more like holes in a blanket, being the only ones that can radiate energy from the atmosphere back to Space, as NASA energy diagrams show happens. They also absorb 19% of incident solar radiation, thus acting like an umbrella, as is obvious when the most prolific greenhouse gas by far, water vapor, forms clouds.
   
   The biggest joke of all is that Pierrehumbert, in his "gold standard" textbook of climatology, calculated what the temperature would be without water vapor but forgot to remove the clouds that would not have existed and the oceans. Their physics is so pathetic that it has obviously now become a fraudulent scam that is backed up with manipulated temperature, radiation and sea level data.
   
   NASA's energy budget diagram is quite wrong because it does not show the energy in the "heat creep" process that I have discovered must exist as a result of the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Instead the NASA diagram shows about half the solar radiation being absorbed by the surface, when in fact most undergoes resonant (or pseudo) scattering, about which I wrote in my paper published on several websites in 2012.
   
   The main energy input to the surfaces of Earth and Venus is not by radiation at all, but by non-radiative heat creep which is defined and explained in my 2013 paper. Both papers are linked at the foot of the 'Evidence' page at http://climate-change-theory.com.
7. what about the Arbor Foundation? I'm a member and they plant trees word-wide!
8. watch out for the propaganda squad in the comments section
9. sorry John, no chemtrails...
10. "chemtrail"? ye shes out there.....also, Holy fucking shit do these idiots actually believe this bourgeois imperialist nonsense about "climate change isnt real?".....its like the fucking US government is running the comment section....capitalist made climate change is very real.......buncha reactionary nutjobs here.....and no theres no chemtrails either, organize a movement, kill capitalism/imperialism
11. Hello friends, IMAGINE a cloud of brown dust covers up the planet due to an asteroid impact...
    
    the amount of sun is far lesser
    
    what edible plants would YOU grow ?
12. she seems drunk...
13. Well meaning, I am sure, but her facts are off.
    Carbon reached 408ppm in May, not 420ppm...yet. It is rising about 4ppm per year now, though.
    Planting rain forest is much better than destroying them for palm oil plantations.
    However, that would do nothing to stop the climate change that is Global Warming.
    The mechanism controlling GW is moving out of the man-made causes of burning fossil fuels,
    and is moving into the realm of feedback mechanisms.
    Feedbacks are what has increased the annual increase of CO2 from 1.5ppm per year, to 4ppm per year.
    There are 2 main feedbacks at play --
    1. Permafrost thawing, and
    2. Methane hydrate melting.
    Planting rain forests would do nothing to affect those processes.
14. Sounds like a Bill Molison model!!! Real selfsustaining. Big movement. I am planning on trying to do the same with some free land offered in by Veracruse. A slow moving rock for me. You make me cry with happiness. May all the good living energy gravitate to all you movers and shakers!
15. Well planting trees is never bad it would help with catbon emissions but it wont fix global warming. Hell if you want the plant to be covered in vegitation like it once was we need to warm it up again and get it outthis ice age. Finding dinosaur bones in tundras shows that these things either lived the cold or the earth was warmer.
16. Global warming is a SHAM....but I still love what you do :)
17. There are studies out there indicating that volcanoes create more carbon dioxide in one single mini eruption than all our vehicles combined. Still, is best to be a good, responsible earth citizen and do what we can to create the least harm to our environment. Thanks for sharing this video, I think some of the info was educational.
18. John, yet another awesome video. In a question unrelated to the video: Have you tried to interview botanist, "James Wong"?Thank you,Mike.
19. I hope you don't get political, I really enjoy your gardening videos.